ASR_BASE

Change-Id: Icf3719cc0afe3eeb3edc7fa80a2eb5199ca9dda1
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/726-v5.5-net-sfp-avoid-power-switch-on-address-change-modules.patch b/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/726-v5.5-net-sfp-avoid-power-switch-on-address-change-modules.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5237f55
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/726-v5.5-net-sfp-avoid-power-switch-on-address-change-modules.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+From dca678b8838945572cf50584cb33a7199c1fd397 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
+Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:24:18 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH 624/660] net: sfp: avoid power switch on address-change
+ modules
+
+If the module indicates that it requires an address change sequence to
+switch between address 0x50 and 0x51, which we don't support, we can't
+write to the register that controls the power mode to switch to high
+power mode.  Warn the user that the module may not be functional in
+this case, and don't try to change the power mode.
+
+Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
+---
+ drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
+ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
++++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+@@ -1385,25 +1385,34 @@ static int sfp_module_parse_power(struct
+ 	if (sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_HIGH_POWER_LEVEL))
+ 		power_mW = 2000;
+ 
+-	if (sfp->id.ext.sff8472_compliance == SFP_SFF8472_COMPLIANCE_NONE &&
+-	    (sfp->id.ext.diagmon & (SFP_DIAGMON_DDM | SFP_DIAGMON_ADDRMODE)) !=
+-	    SFP_DIAGMON_DDM) {
+-		/* The module appears not to implement bus address 0xa2,
+-		 * or requires an address change sequence, so assume that
+-		 * the module powers up in the indicated power mode.
+-		 */
+-		if (power_mW > sfp->max_power_mW) {
++	if (power_mW > sfp->max_power_mW) {
++		/* Module power specification exceeds the allowed maximum. */
++		if (sfp->id.ext.sff8472_compliance ==
++			SFP_SFF8472_COMPLIANCE_NONE &&
++		    !(sfp->id.ext.diagmon & SFP_DIAGMON_DDM)) {
++			/* The module appears not to implement bus address
++			 * 0xa2, so assume that the module powers up in the
++			 * indicated mode.
++			 */
+ 			dev_err(sfp->dev,
+ 				"Host does not support %u.%uW modules\n",
+ 				power_mW / 1000, (power_mW / 100) % 10);
+ 			return -EINVAL;
++		} else {
++			dev_warn(sfp->dev,
++				 "Host does not support %u.%uW modules, module left in power mode 1\n",
++				 power_mW / 1000, (power_mW / 100) % 10);
++			return 0;
+ 		}
+-		return 0;
+ 	}
+ 
+-	if (power_mW > sfp->max_power_mW) {
++	/* If the module requires a higher power mode, but also requires
++	 * an address change sequence, warn the user that the module may
++	 * not be functional.
++	 */
++	if (sfp->id.ext.diagmon & SFP_DIAGMON_ADDRMODE && power_mW > 1000) {
+ 		dev_warn(sfp->dev,
+-			 "Host does not support %u.%uW modules, module left in power mode 1\n",
++			 "Address Change Sequence not supported but module requies %u.%uW, module may not be functional\n",
+ 			 power_mW / 1000, (power_mW / 100) % 10);
+ 		return 0;
+ 	}