blob: 95a3e7a40414c553b6dd38d1b2004aadcd60b423 [file] [log] [blame]
b.liue9582032025-04-17 19:18:16 +08001.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2
3.. _deprecated:
4
5=====================================================================
6Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes, and Conventions
7=====================================================================
8
9In a perfect world, it would be possible to convert all instances of
10some deprecated API into the new API and entirely remove the old API in
11a single development cycle. However, due to the size of the kernel, the
12maintainership hierarchy, and timing, it's not always feasible to do these
13kinds of conversions at once. This means that new instances may sneak into
14the kernel while old ones are being removed, only making the amount of
15work to remove the API grow. In order to educate developers about what
16has been deprecated and why, this list has been created as a place to
17point when uses of deprecated things are proposed for inclusion in the
18kernel.
19
20__deprecated
21------------
22While this attribute does visually mark an interface as deprecated,
23it `does not produce warnings during builds any more
24<https://git.kernel.org/linus/771c035372a036f83353eef46dbb829780330234>`_
25because one of the standing goals of the kernel is to build without
26warnings and no one was actually doing anything to remove these deprecated
27interfaces. While using `__deprecated` is nice to note an old API in
28a header file, it isn't the full solution. Such interfaces must either
29be fully removed from the kernel, or added to this file to discourage
30others from using them in the future.
31
32open-coded arithmetic in allocator arguments
33--------------------------------------------
34Dynamic size calculations (especially multiplication) should not be
35performed in memory allocator (or similar) function arguments due to the
36risk of them overflowing. This could lead to values wrapping around and a
37smaller allocation being made than the caller was expecting. Using those
38allocations could lead to linear overflows of heap memory and other
39misbehaviors. (One exception to this is literal values where the compiler
40can warn if they might overflow. Though using literals for arguments as
41suggested below is also harmless.)
42
43For example, do not use ``count * size`` as an argument, as in::
44
45 foo = kmalloc(count * size, GFP_KERNEL);
46
47Instead, the 2-factor form of the allocator should be used::
48
49 foo = kmalloc_array(count, size, GFP_KERNEL);
50
51Specifically, kmalloc() can be replaced with kmalloc_array(), and
52kzalloc() can be replaced with kcalloc().
53
54If no 2-factor form is available, the saturate-on-overflow helpers should
55be used::
56
57 bar = vmalloc(array_size(count, size));
58
59Another common case to avoid is calculating the size of a structure with
60a trailing array of others structures, as in::
61
62 header = kzalloc(sizeof(*header) + count * sizeof(*header->item),
63 GFP_KERNEL);
64
65Instead, use the helper::
66
67 header = kzalloc(struct_size(header, item, count), GFP_KERNEL);
68
69For other calculations, please compose the use of the size_mul(),
70size_add(), and size_sub() helpers. For example, in the case of::
71
72 foo = krealloc(current_size + chunk_size * (count - 3), GFP_KERNEL);
73
74Instead, use the helpers::
75
76 foo = krealloc(size_add(current_size,
77 size_mul(chunk_size,
78 size_sub(count, 3))), GFP_KERNEL);
79
80For more details, also see array3_size() and flex_array_size(),
81as well as the related check_mul_overflow(), check_add_overflow(),
82check_sub_overflow(), and check_shl_overflow() family of functions.
83
84simple_strtol(), simple_strtoll(), simple_strtoul(), simple_strtoull()
85----------------------------------------------------------------------
86The :c:func:`simple_strtol`, :c:func:`simple_strtoll`,
87:c:func:`simple_strtoul`, and :c:func:`simple_strtoull` functions
88explicitly ignore overflows, which may lead to unexpected results
89in callers. The respective :c:func:`kstrtol`, :c:func:`kstrtoll`,
90:c:func:`kstrtoul`, and :c:func:`kstrtoull` functions tend to be the
91correct replacements, though note that those require the string to be
92NUL or newline terminated.
93
94strcpy()
95--------
96:c:func:`strcpy` performs no bounds checking on the destination
97buffer. This could result in linear overflows beyond the
98end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of misbehaviors. While
99`CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y` and various compiler flags help reduce the
100risk of using this function, there is no good reason to add new uses of
101this function. The safe replacement is :c:func:`strscpy`.
102
103strncpy() on NUL-terminated strings
104-----------------------------------
105Use of :c:func:`strncpy` does not guarantee that the destination buffer
106will be NUL terminated. This can lead to various linear read overflows
107and other misbehavior due to the missing termination. It also NUL-pads the
108destination buffer if the source contents are shorter than the destination
109buffer size, which may be a needless performance penalty for callers using
110only NUL-terminated strings. The safe replacement is :c:func:`strscpy`.
111(Users of :c:func:`strscpy` still needing NUL-padding will need an
112explicit :c:func:`memset` added.)
113
114If a caller is using non-NUL-terminated strings, :c:func:`strncpy()` can
115still be used, but destinations should be marked with the `__nonstring
116<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Variable-Attributes.html>`_
117attribute to avoid future compiler warnings.
118
119strlcpy()
120---------
121:c:func:`strlcpy` reads the entire source buffer first, possibly exceeding
122the given limit of bytes to copy. This is inefficient and can lead to
123linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated. The
124safe replacement is :c:func:`strscpy`.
125
126Variable Length Arrays (VLAs)
127-----------------------------
128Using stack VLAs produces much worse machine code than statically
129sized stack arrays. While these non-trivial `performance issues
130<https://git.kernel.org/linus/02361bc77888>`_ are reason enough to
131eliminate VLAs, they are also a security risk. Dynamic growth of a stack
132array may exceed the remaining memory in the stack segment. This could
133lead to a crash, possible overwriting sensitive contents at the end of the
134stack (when built without `CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y`), or overwriting
135memory adjacent to the stack (when built without `CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y`)
136
137Implicit switch case fall-through
138---------------------------------
139The C language allows switch cases to "fall-through" when a "break" statement
140is missing at the end of a case. This, however, introduces ambiguity in the
141code, as it's not always clear if the missing break is intentional or a bug.
142
143As there have been a long list of flaws `due to missing "break" statements
144<https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/484.html>`_, we no longer allow
145"implicit fall-through".
146
147In order to identify intentional fall-through cases, we have adopted a
148pseudo-keyword macro 'fallthrough' which expands to gcc's extension
149__attribute__((__fallthrough__)). `Statement Attributes
150<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Attributes.html>`_
151
152When the C17/C18 [[fallthrough]] syntax is more commonly supported by
153C compilers, static analyzers, and IDEs, we can switch to using that syntax
154for the macro pseudo-keyword.
155
156All switch/case blocks must end in one of:
157
158 break;
159 fallthrough;
160 continue;
161 goto <label>;
162 return [expression];