|  | Debugging hibernation and suspend | 
|  | (C) 2007 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>, GPL | 
|  |  | 
|  | 1. Testing hibernation (aka suspend to disk or STD) | 
|  |  | 
|  | To check if hibernation works, you can try to hibernate in the "reboot" mode: | 
|  |  | 
|  | # echo reboot > /sys/power/disk | 
|  | # echo disk > /sys/power/state | 
|  |  | 
|  | and the system should create a hibernation image, reboot, resume and get back to | 
|  | the command prompt where you have started the transition.  If that happens, | 
|  | hibernation is most likely to work correctly.  Still, you need to repeat the | 
|  | test at least a couple of times in a row for confidence.  [This is necessary, | 
|  | because some problems only show up on a second attempt at suspending and | 
|  | resuming the system.]  Moreover, hibernating in the "reboot" and "shutdown" | 
|  | modes causes the PM core to skip some platform-related callbacks which on ACPI | 
|  | systems might be necessary to make hibernation work.  Thus, if your machine fails | 
|  | to hibernate or resume in the "reboot" mode, you should try the "platform" mode: | 
|  |  | 
|  | # echo platform > /sys/power/disk | 
|  | # echo disk > /sys/power/state | 
|  |  | 
|  | which is the default and recommended mode of hibernation. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Unfortunately, the "platform" mode of hibernation does not work on some systems | 
|  | with broken BIOSes.  In such cases the "shutdown" mode of hibernation might | 
|  | work: | 
|  |  | 
|  | # echo shutdown > /sys/power/disk | 
|  | # echo disk > /sys/power/state | 
|  |  | 
|  | (it is similar to the "reboot" mode, but it requires you to press the power | 
|  | button to make the system resume). | 
|  |  | 
|  | If neither "platform" nor "shutdown" hibernation mode works, you will need to | 
|  | identify what goes wrong. | 
|  |  | 
|  | a) Test modes of hibernation | 
|  |  | 
|  | To find out why hibernation fails on your system, you can use a special testing | 
|  | facility available if the kernel is compiled with CONFIG_PM_DEBUG set.  Then, | 
|  | there is the file /sys/power/pm_test that can be used to make the hibernation | 
|  | core run in a test mode.  There are 5 test modes available: | 
|  |  | 
|  | freezer | 
|  | - test the freezing of processes | 
|  |  | 
|  | devices | 
|  | - test the freezing of processes and suspending of devices | 
|  |  | 
|  | platform | 
|  | - test the freezing of processes, suspending of devices and platform | 
|  | global control methods(*) | 
|  |  | 
|  | processors | 
|  | - test the freezing of processes, suspending of devices, platform | 
|  | global control methods(*) and the disabling of nonboot CPUs | 
|  |  | 
|  | core | 
|  | - test the freezing of processes, suspending of devices, platform global | 
|  | control methods(*), the disabling of nonboot CPUs and suspending of | 
|  | platform/system devices | 
|  |  | 
|  | (*) the platform global control methods are only available on ACPI systems | 
|  | and are only tested if the hibernation mode is set to "platform" | 
|  |  | 
|  | To use one of them it is necessary to write the corresponding string to | 
|  | /sys/power/pm_test (eg. "devices" to test the freezing of processes and | 
|  | suspending devices) and issue the standard hibernation commands.  For example, | 
|  | to use the "devices" test mode along with the "platform" mode of hibernation, | 
|  | you should do the following: | 
|  |  | 
|  | # echo devices > /sys/power/pm_test | 
|  | # echo platform > /sys/power/disk | 
|  | # echo disk > /sys/power/state | 
|  |  | 
|  | Then, the kernel will try to freeze processes, suspend devices, wait a few | 
|  | seconds (5 by default, but configurable by the suspend.pm_test_delay module | 
|  | parameter), resume devices and thaw processes.  If "platform" is written to | 
|  | /sys/power/pm_test , then after suspending devices the kernel will additionally | 
|  | invoke the global control methods (eg. ACPI global control methods) used to | 
|  | prepare the platform firmware for hibernation.  Next, it will wait a | 
|  | configurable number of seconds and invoke the platform (eg. ACPI) global | 
|  | methods used to cancel hibernation etc. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Writing "none" to /sys/power/pm_test causes the kernel to switch to the normal | 
|  | hibernation/suspend operations.  Also, when open for reading, /sys/power/pm_test | 
|  | contains a space-separated list of all available tests (including "none" that | 
|  | represents the normal functionality) in which the current test level is | 
|  | indicated by square brackets. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Generally, as you can see, each test level is more "invasive" than the previous | 
|  | one and the "core" level tests the hardware and drivers as deeply as possible | 
|  | without creating a hibernation image.  Obviously, if the "devices" test fails, | 
|  | the "platform" test will fail as well and so on.  Thus, as a rule of thumb, you | 
|  | should try the test modes starting from "freezer", through "devices", "platform" | 
|  | and "processors" up to "core" (repeat the test on each level a couple of times | 
|  | to make sure that any random factors are avoided). | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the "freezer" test fails, there is a task that cannot be frozen (in that case | 
|  | it usually is possible to identify the offending task by analysing the output of | 
|  | dmesg obtained after the failing test).  Failure at this level usually means | 
|  | that there is a problem with the tasks freezer subsystem that should be | 
|  | reported. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the "devices" test fails, most likely there is a driver that cannot suspend | 
|  | or resume its device (in the latter case the system may hang or become unstable | 
|  | after the test, so please take that into consideration).  To find this driver, | 
|  | you can carry out a binary search according to the rules: | 
|  | - if the test fails, unload a half of the drivers currently loaded and repeat | 
|  | (that would probably involve rebooting the system, so always note what drivers | 
|  | have been loaded before the test), | 
|  | - if the test succeeds, load a half of the drivers you have unloaded most | 
|  | recently and repeat. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Once you have found the failing driver (there can be more than just one of | 
|  | them), you have to unload it every time before hibernation.  In that case please | 
|  | make sure to report the problem with the driver. | 
|  |  | 
|  | It is also possible that the "devices" test will still fail after you have | 
|  | unloaded all modules. In that case, you may want to look in your kernel | 
|  | configuration for the drivers that can be compiled as modules (and test again | 
|  | with these drivers compiled as modules).  You may also try to use some special | 
|  | kernel command line options such as "noapic", "noacpi" or even "acpi=off". | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the "platform" test fails, there is a problem with the handling of the | 
|  | platform (eg. ACPI) firmware on your system.  In that case the "platform" mode | 
|  | of hibernation is not likely to work.  You can try the "shutdown" mode, but that | 
|  | is rather a poor man's workaround. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the "processors" test fails, the disabling/enabling of nonboot CPUs does not | 
|  | work (of course, this only may be an issue on SMP systems) and the problem | 
|  | should be reported.  In that case you can also try to switch the nonboot CPUs | 
|  | off and on using the /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online sysfs attributes and | 
|  | see if that works. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the "core" test fails, which means that suspending of the system/platform | 
|  | devices has failed (these devices are suspended on one CPU with interrupts off), | 
|  | the problem is most probably hardware-related and serious, so it should be | 
|  | reported. | 
|  |  | 
|  | A failure of any of the "platform", "processors" or "core" tests may cause your | 
|  | system to hang or become unstable, so please beware.  Such a failure usually | 
|  | indicates a serious problem that very well may be related to the hardware, but | 
|  | please report it anyway. | 
|  |  | 
|  | b) Testing minimal configuration | 
|  |  | 
|  | If all of the hibernation test modes work, you can boot the system with the | 
|  | "init=/bin/bash" command line parameter and attempt to hibernate in the | 
|  | "reboot", "shutdown" and "platform" modes.  If that does not work, there | 
|  | probably is a problem with a driver statically compiled into the kernel and you | 
|  | can try to compile more drivers as modules, so that they can be tested | 
|  | individually.  Otherwise, there is a problem with a modular driver and you can | 
|  | find it by loading a half of the modules you normally use and binary searching | 
|  | in accordance with the algorithm: | 
|  | - if there are n modules loaded and the attempt to suspend and resume fails, | 
|  | unload n/2 of the modules and try again (that would probably involve rebooting | 
|  | the system), | 
|  | - if there are n modules loaded and the attempt to suspend and resume succeeds, | 
|  | load n/2 modules more and try again. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Again, if you find the offending module(s), it(they) must be unloaded every time | 
|  | before hibernation, and please report the problem with it(them). | 
|  |  | 
|  | c) Using the "test_resume" hibernation option | 
|  |  | 
|  | /sys/power/disk generally tells the kernel what to do after creating a | 
|  | hibernation image.  One of the available options is "test_resume" which | 
|  | causes the just created image to be used for immediate restoration.  Namely, | 
|  | after doing: | 
|  |  | 
|  | # echo test_resume > /sys/power/disk | 
|  | # echo disk > /sys/power/state | 
|  |  | 
|  | a hibernation image will be created and a resume from it will be triggered | 
|  | immediately without involving the platform firmware in any way. | 
|  |  | 
|  | That test can be used to check if failures to resume from hibernation are | 
|  | related to bad interactions with the platform firmware.  That is, if the above | 
|  | works every time, but resume from actual hibernation does not work or is | 
|  | unreliable, the platform firmware may be responsible for the failures. | 
|  |  | 
|  | On architectures and platforms that support using different kernels to restore | 
|  | hibernation images (that is, the kernel used to read the image from storage and | 
|  | load it into memory is different from the one included in the image) or support | 
|  | kernel address space randomization, it also can be used to check if failures | 
|  | to resume may be related to the differences between the restore and image | 
|  | kernels. | 
|  |  | 
|  | d) Advanced debugging | 
|  |  | 
|  | In case that hibernation does not work on your system even in the minimal | 
|  | configuration and compiling more drivers as modules is not practical or some | 
|  | modules cannot be unloaded, you can use one of the more advanced debugging | 
|  | techniques to find the problem.  First, if there is a serial port in your box, | 
|  | you can boot the kernel with the 'no_console_suspend' parameter and try to log | 
|  | kernel messages using the serial console.  This may provide you with some | 
|  | information about the reasons of the suspend (resume) failure.  Alternatively, | 
|  | it may be possible to use a FireWire port for debugging with firescope | 
|  | (http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/firescope/).  On x86 it is also possible to | 
|  | use the PM_TRACE mechanism documented in Documentation/power/s2ram.txt . | 
|  |  | 
|  | 2. Testing suspend to RAM (STR) | 
|  |  | 
|  | To verify that the STR works, it is generally more convenient to use the s2ram | 
|  | tool available from http://suspend.sf.net and documented at | 
|  | http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Suspend_to_RAM (S2RAM_LINK). | 
|  |  | 
|  | Namely, after writing "freezer", "devices", "platform", "processors", or "core" | 
|  | into /sys/power/pm_test (available if the kernel is compiled with | 
|  | CONFIG_PM_DEBUG set) the suspend code will work in the test mode corresponding | 
|  | to given string.  The STR test modes are defined in the same way as for | 
|  | hibernation, so please refer to Section 1 for more information about them.  In | 
|  | particular, the "core" test allows you to test everything except for the actual | 
|  | invocation of the platform firmware in order to put the system into the sleep | 
|  | state. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Among other things, the testing with the help of /sys/power/pm_test may allow | 
|  | you to identify drivers that fail to suspend or resume their devices.  They | 
|  | should be unloaded every time before an STR transition. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Next, you can follow the instructions at S2RAM_LINK to test the system, but if | 
|  | it does not work "out of the box", you may need to boot it with | 
|  | "init=/bin/bash" and test s2ram in the minimal configuration.  In that case, | 
|  | you may be able to search for failing drivers by following the procedure | 
|  | analogous to the one described in section 1.  If you find some failing drivers, | 
|  | you will have to unload them every time before an STR transition (ie. before | 
|  | you run s2ram), and please report the problems with them. | 
|  |  | 
|  | There is a debugfs entry which shows the suspend to RAM statistics. Here is an | 
|  | example of its output. | 
|  | # mount -t debugfs none /sys/kernel/debug | 
|  | # cat /sys/kernel/debug/suspend_stats | 
|  | success: 20 | 
|  | fail: 5 | 
|  | failed_freeze: 0 | 
|  | failed_prepare: 0 | 
|  | failed_suspend: 5 | 
|  | failed_suspend_noirq: 0 | 
|  | failed_resume: 0 | 
|  | failed_resume_noirq: 0 | 
|  | failures: | 
|  | last_failed_dev:	alarm | 
|  | adc | 
|  | last_failed_errno:	-16 | 
|  | -16 | 
|  | last_failed_step:	suspend | 
|  | suspend | 
|  | Field success means the success number of suspend to RAM, and field fail means | 
|  | the failure number. Others are the failure number of different steps of suspend | 
|  | to RAM. suspend_stats just lists the last 2 failed devices, error number and | 
|  | failed step of suspend. |