| xj | b04a402 | 2021-11-25 15:01:52 +0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Memory Resource Controller(Memcg)  Implementation Memo. | 
|  | 2 | Last Updated: 2010/2 | 
|  | 3 | Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.33-rc7-mm(candidate for 34). | 
|  | 4 |  | 
|  | 5 | Because VM is getting complex (one of reasons is memcg...), memcg's behavior | 
|  | 6 | is complex. This is a document for memcg's internal behavior. | 
|  | 7 | Please note that implementation details can be changed. | 
|  | 8 |  | 
|  | 9 | (*) Topics on API should be in Documentation/cgroup-v1/memory.txt) | 
|  | 10 |  | 
|  | 11 | 0. How to record usage ? | 
|  | 12 | 2 objects are used. | 
|  | 13 |  | 
|  | 14 | page_cgroup ....an object per page. | 
|  | 15 | Allocated at boot or memory hotplug. Freed at memory hot removal. | 
|  | 16 |  | 
|  | 17 | swap_cgroup ... an entry per swp_entry. | 
|  | 18 | Allocated at swapon(). Freed at swapoff(). | 
|  | 19 |  | 
|  | 20 | The page_cgroup has USED bit and double count against a page_cgroup never | 
|  | 21 | occurs. swap_cgroup is used only when a charged page is swapped-out. | 
|  | 22 |  | 
|  | 23 | 1. Charge | 
|  | 24 |  | 
|  | 25 | a page/swp_entry may be charged (usage += PAGE_SIZE) at | 
|  | 26 |  | 
|  | 27 | mem_cgroup_try_charge() | 
|  | 28 |  | 
|  | 29 | 2. Uncharge | 
|  | 30 | a page/swp_entry may be uncharged (usage -= PAGE_SIZE) by | 
|  | 31 |  | 
|  | 32 | mem_cgroup_uncharge() | 
|  | 33 | Called when a page's refcount goes down to 0. | 
|  | 34 |  | 
|  | 35 | mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap() | 
|  | 36 | Called when swp_entry's refcnt goes down to 0. A charge against swap | 
|  | 37 | disappears. | 
|  | 38 |  | 
|  | 39 | 3. charge-commit-cancel | 
|  | 40 | Memcg pages are charged in two steps: | 
|  | 41 | mem_cgroup_try_charge() | 
|  | 42 | mem_cgroup_commit_charge() or mem_cgroup_cancel_charge() | 
|  | 43 |  | 
|  | 44 | At try_charge(), there are no flags to say "this page is charged". | 
|  | 45 | at this point, usage += PAGE_SIZE. | 
|  | 46 |  | 
|  | 47 | At commit(), the page is associated with the memcg. | 
|  | 48 |  | 
|  | 49 | At cancel(), simply usage -= PAGE_SIZE. | 
|  | 50 |  | 
|  | 51 | Under below explanation, we assume CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP=y. | 
|  | 52 |  | 
|  | 53 | 4. Anonymous | 
|  | 54 | Anonymous page is newly allocated at | 
|  | 55 | - page fault into MAP_ANONYMOUS mapping. | 
|  | 56 | - Copy-On-Write. | 
|  | 57 |  | 
|  | 58 | 4.1 Swap-in. | 
|  | 59 | At swap-in, the page is taken from swap-cache. There are 2 cases. | 
|  | 60 |  | 
|  | 61 | (a) If the SwapCache is newly allocated and read, it has no charges. | 
|  | 62 | (b) If the SwapCache has been mapped by processes, it has been | 
|  | 63 | charged already. | 
|  | 64 |  | 
|  | 65 | 4.2 Swap-out. | 
|  | 66 | At swap-out, typical state transition is below. | 
|  | 67 |  | 
|  | 68 | (a) add to swap cache. (marked as SwapCache) | 
|  | 69 | swp_entry's refcnt += 1. | 
|  | 70 | (b) fully unmapped. | 
|  | 71 | swp_entry's refcnt += # of ptes. | 
|  | 72 | (c) write back to swap. | 
|  | 73 | (d) delete from swap cache. (remove from SwapCache) | 
|  | 74 | swp_entry's refcnt -= 1. | 
|  | 75 |  | 
|  | 76 |  | 
|  | 77 | Finally, at task exit, | 
|  | 78 | (e) zap_pte() is called and swp_entry's refcnt -=1 -> 0. | 
|  | 79 |  | 
|  | 80 | 5. Page Cache | 
|  | 81 | Page Cache is charged at | 
|  | 82 | - add_to_page_cache_locked(). | 
|  | 83 |  | 
|  | 84 | The logic is very clear. (About migration, see below) | 
|  | 85 | Note: __remove_from_page_cache() is called by remove_from_page_cache() | 
|  | 86 | and __remove_mapping(). | 
|  | 87 |  | 
|  | 88 | 6. Shmem(tmpfs) Page Cache | 
|  | 89 | The best way to understand shmem's page state transition is to read | 
|  | 90 | mm/shmem.c. | 
|  | 91 | But brief explanation of the behavior of memcg around shmem will be | 
|  | 92 | helpful to understand the logic. | 
|  | 93 |  | 
|  | 94 | Shmem's page (just leaf page, not direct/indirect block) can be on | 
|  | 95 | - radix-tree of shmem's inode. | 
|  | 96 | - SwapCache. | 
|  | 97 | - Both on radix-tree and SwapCache. This happens at swap-in | 
|  | 98 | and swap-out, | 
|  | 99 |  | 
|  | 100 | It's charged when... | 
|  | 101 | - A new page is added to shmem's radix-tree. | 
|  | 102 | - A swp page is read. (move a charge from swap_cgroup to page_cgroup) | 
|  | 103 |  | 
|  | 104 | 7. Page Migration | 
|  | 105 |  | 
|  | 106 | mem_cgroup_migrate() | 
|  | 107 |  | 
|  | 108 | 8. LRU | 
|  | 109 | Each memcg has its own private LRU. Now, its handling is under global | 
|  | 110 | VM's control (means that it's handled under global zone_lru_lock). | 
|  | 111 | Almost all routines around memcg's LRU is called by global LRU's | 
|  | 112 | list management functions under zone_lru_lock(). | 
|  | 113 |  | 
|  | 114 | A special function is mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(). This scans | 
|  | 115 | memcg's private LRU and call __isolate_lru_page() to extract a page | 
|  | 116 | from LRU. | 
|  | 117 | (By __isolate_lru_page(), the page is removed from both of global and | 
|  | 118 | private LRU.) | 
|  | 119 |  | 
|  | 120 |  | 
|  | 121 | 9. Typical Tests. | 
|  | 122 |  | 
|  | 123 | Tests for racy cases. | 
|  | 124 |  | 
|  | 125 | 9.1 Small limit to memcg. | 
|  | 126 | When you do test to do racy case, it's good test to set memcg's limit | 
|  | 127 | to be very small rather than GB. Many races found in the test under | 
|  | 128 | xKB or xxMB limits. | 
|  | 129 | (Memory behavior under GB and Memory behavior under MB shows very | 
|  | 130 | different situation.) | 
|  | 131 |  | 
|  | 132 | 9.2 Shmem | 
|  | 133 | Historically, memcg's shmem handling was poor and we saw some amount | 
|  | 134 | of troubles here. This is because shmem is page-cache but can be | 
|  | 135 | SwapCache. Test with shmem/tmpfs is always good test. | 
|  | 136 |  | 
|  | 137 | 9.3 Migration | 
|  | 138 | For NUMA, migration is an another special case. To do easy test, cpuset | 
|  | 139 | is useful. Following is a sample script to do migration. | 
|  | 140 |  | 
|  | 141 | mount -t cgroup -o cpuset none /opt/cpuset | 
|  | 142 |  | 
|  | 143 | mkdir /opt/cpuset/01 | 
|  | 144 | echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.cpus | 
|  | 145 | echo 0 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.mems | 
|  | 146 | echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.memory_migrate | 
|  | 147 | mkdir /opt/cpuset/02 | 
|  | 148 | echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.cpus | 
|  | 149 | echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.mems | 
|  | 150 | echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.memory_migrate | 
|  | 151 |  | 
|  | 152 | In above set, when you moves a task from 01 to 02, page migration to | 
|  | 153 | node 0 to node 1 will occur. Following is a script to migrate all | 
|  | 154 | under cpuset. | 
|  | 155 | -- | 
|  | 156 | move_task() | 
|  | 157 | { | 
|  | 158 | for pid in $1 | 
|  | 159 | do | 
|  | 160 | /bin/echo $pid >$2/tasks 2>/dev/null | 
|  | 161 | echo -n $pid | 
|  | 162 | echo -n " " | 
|  | 163 | done | 
|  | 164 | echo END | 
|  | 165 | } | 
|  | 166 |  | 
|  | 167 | G1_TASK=`cat ${G1}/tasks` | 
|  | 168 | G2_TASK=`cat ${G2}/tasks` | 
|  | 169 | move_task "${G1_TASK}" ${G2} & | 
|  | 170 | -- | 
|  | 171 | 9.4 Memory hotplug. | 
|  | 172 | memory hotplug test is one of good test. | 
|  | 173 | to offline memory, do following. | 
|  | 174 | # echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/state | 
|  | 175 | (XXX is the place of memory) | 
|  | 176 | This is an easy way to test page migration, too. | 
|  | 177 |  | 
|  | 178 | 9.5 mkdir/rmdir | 
|  | 179 | When using hierarchy, mkdir/rmdir test should be done. | 
|  | 180 | Use tests like the following. | 
|  | 181 |  | 
|  | 182 | echo 1 >/opt/cgroup/01/memory/use_hierarchy | 
|  | 183 | mkdir /opt/cgroup/01/child_a | 
|  | 184 | mkdir /opt/cgroup/01/child_b | 
|  | 185 |  | 
|  | 186 | set limit to 01. | 
|  | 187 | add limit to 01/child_b | 
|  | 188 | run jobs under child_a and child_b | 
|  | 189 |  | 
|  | 190 | create/delete following groups at random while jobs are running. | 
|  | 191 | /opt/cgroup/01/child_a/child_aa | 
|  | 192 | /opt/cgroup/01/child_b/child_bb | 
|  | 193 | /opt/cgroup/01/child_c | 
|  | 194 |  | 
|  | 195 | running new jobs in new group is also good. | 
|  | 196 |  | 
|  | 197 | 9.6 Mount with other subsystems. | 
|  | 198 | Mounting with other subsystems is a good test because there is a | 
|  | 199 | race and lock dependency with other cgroup subsystems. | 
|  | 200 |  | 
|  | 201 | example) | 
|  | 202 | # mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o cpuset,memory,cpu,devices | 
|  | 203 |  | 
|  | 204 | and do task move, mkdir, rmdir etc...under this. | 
|  | 205 |  | 
|  | 206 | 9.7 swapoff. | 
|  | 207 | Besides management of swap is one of complicated parts of memcg, | 
|  | 208 | call path of swap-in at swapoff is not same as usual swap-in path.. | 
|  | 209 | It's worth to be tested explicitly. | 
|  | 210 |  | 
|  | 211 | For example, test like following is good. | 
|  | 212 | (Shell-A) | 
|  | 213 | # mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o memory | 
|  | 214 | # mkdir /cgroup/test | 
|  | 215 | # echo 40M > /cgroup/test/memory.limit_in_bytes | 
|  | 216 | # echo 0 > /cgroup/test/tasks | 
|  | 217 | Run malloc(100M) program under this. You'll see 60M of swaps. | 
|  | 218 | (Shell-B) | 
|  | 219 | # move all tasks in /cgroup/test to /cgroup | 
|  | 220 | # /sbin/swapoff -a | 
|  | 221 | # rmdir /cgroup/test | 
|  | 222 | # kill malloc task. | 
|  | 223 |  | 
|  | 224 | Of course, tmpfs v.s. swapoff test should be tested, too. | 
|  | 225 |  | 
|  | 226 | 9.8 OOM-Killer | 
|  | 227 | Out-of-memory caused by memcg's limit will kill tasks under | 
|  | 228 | the memcg. When hierarchy is used, a task under hierarchy | 
|  | 229 | will be killed by the kernel. | 
|  | 230 | In this case, panic_on_oom shouldn't be invoked and tasks | 
|  | 231 | in other groups shouldn't be killed. | 
|  | 232 |  | 
|  | 233 | It's not difficult to cause OOM under memcg as following. | 
|  | 234 | Case A) when you can swapoff | 
|  | 235 | #swapoff -a | 
|  | 236 | #echo 50M > /memory.limit_in_bytes | 
|  | 237 | run 51M of malloc | 
|  | 238 |  | 
|  | 239 | Case B) when you use mem+swap limitation. | 
|  | 240 | #echo 50M > memory.limit_in_bytes | 
|  | 241 | #echo 50M > memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes | 
|  | 242 | run 51M of malloc | 
|  | 243 |  | 
|  | 244 | 9.9 Move charges at task migration | 
|  | 245 | Charges associated with a task can be moved along with task migration. | 
|  | 246 |  | 
|  | 247 | (Shell-A) | 
|  | 248 | #mkdir /cgroup/A | 
|  | 249 | #echo $$ >/cgroup/A/tasks | 
|  | 250 | run some programs which uses some amount of memory in /cgroup/A. | 
|  | 251 |  | 
|  | 252 | (Shell-B) | 
|  | 253 | #mkdir /cgroup/B | 
|  | 254 | #echo 1 >/cgroup/B/memory.move_charge_at_immigrate | 
|  | 255 | #echo "pid of the program running in group A" >/cgroup/B/tasks | 
|  | 256 |  | 
|  | 257 | You can see charges have been moved by reading *.usage_in_bytes or | 
|  | 258 | memory.stat of both A and B. | 
|  | 259 | See 8.2 of Documentation/cgroup-v1/memory.txt to see what value should be | 
|  | 260 | written to move_charge_at_immigrate. | 
|  | 261 |  | 
|  | 262 | 9.10 Memory thresholds | 
|  | 263 | Memory controller implements memory thresholds using cgroups notification | 
|  | 264 | API. You can use tools/cgroup/cgroup_event_listener.c to test it. | 
|  | 265 |  | 
|  | 266 | (Shell-A) Create cgroup and run event listener | 
|  | 267 | # mkdir /cgroup/A | 
|  | 268 | # ./cgroup_event_listener /cgroup/A/memory.usage_in_bytes 5M | 
|  | 269 |  | 
|  | 270 | (Shell-B) Add task to cgroup and try to allocate and free memory | 
|  | 271 | # echo $$ >/cgroup/A/tasks | 
|  | 272 | # a="$(dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=10)" | 
|  | 273 | # a= | 
|  | 274 |  | 
|  | 275 | You will see message from cgroup_event_listener every time you cross | 
|  | 276 | the thresholds. | 
|  | 277 |  | 
|  | 278 | Use /cgroup/A/memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes to test memsw thresholds. | 
|  | 279 |  | 
|  | 280 | It's good idea to test root cgroup as well. |